What generators skip when they ship you a working demo.
Same four gaps, almost every time — because the tools optimize for a working demo, not a production system.
Sessions that never expire
Anyone with a stale token stays logged in forever — no expiry, no server-side revocation.
Row-level security left wide open
Any authenticated user can read — sometimes write — every other user's rows.
Secrets sitting in the bundle
API keys hardcoded in the frontend, .env files committed to git history.
One region, zero caching
No rate limiting, no caching layer — the first real traffic spike takes the whole app down.
Three tiers
Fixed scope, fixed price. No sales call required to start.
Audit
$500 · 3 days- Full review: auth, database rules, secrets, rate limits, error handling, deploy path
- Loom walkthrough of every finding, ranked by severity
- Prioritized fix list you can hand to any developer
Hardening Sprint
$2,500 · 7–10 days- Everything the audit found, fixed and verified
- Auth, access rules, secrets, rate limiting, input validation
- CI/CD pipeline and a clean, repeatable deploy
Care Plan
$800/mo- Uptime and error monitoring watched by a human
- Security patches and bug fixes as they arise
- A small feature or change each month
Three steps, no back-and-forth
Pay the deposit, send access, get a plain-language report. That's the whole first loop.
Send the repo
GitHub link or export from Lovable, Bolt, v0, Replit, or Cursor. No migration needed — I work with what you already have.
I run the audit
Auth, database, secrets, and scale checked against a production-readiness checklist. Loom walkthrough and written report in 3 days.
I ship the fixes
If you book the sprint: PRs with a rollback plan attached. You review and merge — nothing goes out without your sign-off.
Who's behind this
One engineer, based in Moldova. No agency, no account managers, no junior handoff — whoever reviews your code is who fixes it and who you email. My work is public: an open-source production-readiness checklist, a before/after writeup of a real hardening project, and my GitHub history. You're hiring a specific person with a readable track record, not a logo.
Questions
Why trust someone with no reviews yet?
The service is new, so no testimonials yet. Public instead: the open-source checklist I audit against, a before/after writeup of real work, and my GitHub history. The audit is cheap and fast by design — judge the work before committing further.
What if the audit finds little?
You get a short report confirming the app is solid — a fine result for $500. If it's clean, I'll say so and won't invent work.
How does payment work?
50% deposit, 50% on delivery, via Payoneer, Wise, or PayPal. Care Plan is billed monthly in advance. No long contracts. See the refund policy for cancellation terms.
Timezone and communication?
Eastern European Time, UTC+2/+3 — overlaps US mornings and the full European day. Async updates by default, calls on request.
Which stacks do you handle?
React/Next.js, Supabase or Postgres, serverless and edge functions, Vercel or Netlify, Stripe. Built on Lovable, Bolt, v0, Replit Agent, or Cursor? Very likely in scope.
Is 7–10 days realistic?
For one app with typical audit findings, yes. If something bigger surfaces — a full auth rebuild, a data migration — I'll flag it before the sprint starts and scope it properly.
Do you track visitors on this site?
No. This page sets no tracking cookies and loads no analytics or third-party scripts — fonts are served from this same domain. Booking happens on Cal.com under its own privacy policy; nothing you type there reaches me until you submit it. See the privacy policy for the full picture.